Codes of conduct
McGarrigle labored under several misperceptions and alarmist ideas. First, that YouTube should act as arbiter of taste, or as a benign universal parent, deleting videos that might hurt feelings. Second, McGarrigle proposed that anonymous uploading be prohibited, so that every bullying perpetrator could be tracked down. Third, and the most profound misunderstanding, McGarrigle seems to think that human nature can be curbed on the Internet, the freest and most uninhibited venue for the expression of all human moods and tendencies.
I can't help believing that Tim O'Reilly is affected by the same delusions as McGarrigle, though in a less panicky manner. O'Reilly wants bloggers to agree to prohibit anonymous commenting by implementing email confirmation. This is both undesirable on some blogs and naive on all blogs. Confirmation emails do not pierce the anonymity of anyone who wants to remain hidden, and it's actually rather startling that Tim O'Reilly would pretend that they do.
Some of what O'Reilly proposes ("ignore the trolls") is the kind of mandate that everyone was repeating in 1992 when I got started in this business, and requires periodic restatement as a reminder. That's fine. But let's keep a grip on reality. Codes and laws describe ideal human behavior, but they don't really have much power over human behavior. Society writes laws that most people already agree about and follow. Burglery is against the law because most people aren't burglars. Those who are burglars toss aside the law to burgle. (Is there a more amusing verb than "to burgle"?)
Let's resist codification of blogging, and of the Internet generally. Frontier freedoms are short-lived enough without hastening their demise through rigid thinking and formalized behavior.
Reader Comments
(Page 1)2. (yes, to hamburgle)
Posted at 12:34AM on Apr 11th 2007 by Geoff
3. I wholeheartedly agree with your position re: The Code of Conduct. And, 'to burgle' followed by 'to hamburgle'? Awesome.
Posted at 2:47AM on Apr 11th 2007 by Rahul Pathak
4. There should be no code of conduct. Most intelligent people understand how to effectively communicate in the blogosphere. If we turn blogs into a policed form of expression, human nature says we'll come up another way to communicate freely. I hope the current state of blogging remains as is for a long time.
Posted at 11:34AM on Apr 11th 2007 by Johnny T
5. Hi,
The O'Reilly Code of Conduct seems like a cross between a mad March myth and an April fool joke that's become deadly serious.
I prefer the verb to 'burglarize'
Regards,
Coral
Posted at 5:33PM on May 2nd 2007 by Coral


1. I guess one could do this voluntarily, but I agree with Dave Winer when he said it solves a problem that didn't really exist to begin with.
Posted at 3:23PM on Apr 10th 2007 by Victor Agreda Jr